Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Polimeni's avatar

The climate angle on payments infrastructure is underrated. Real-time payment rails actually have an interesting efficiency argument, since fewer failed transactions, chargebacks, and manual reconciliation processes mean less computational waste across the entire ecosystem. The carbon cost of a disputed transaction touching 6 different systems is something nobody's calculating.

The Starlink-Google pairing is worth watching for merchant acquiring specifically because connectivity dead zones are a real revenue problem at the point of sale, not just an inconvenience. Curious whether you see satellite-backed redundancy becoming a serious conversation in financial infrastructure or just staying in the "remote areas" bucket for now.

John Polimeni's avatar

The real-time payments and energy question is one nobody in this industry wants to touch honestly. RTP and FedNow run 24/7/365 on always-on infrastructure, which is a fundamentally different energy profile than batch settlement windows that let systems rest. The Starlink-Google angle is interesting but the last-mile connectivity problem it solves for payments in remote areas is real, I see merchants in rural markets getting crushed by connectivity gaps that make even basic card acceptance unreliable. Worth thinking about whether the carbon cost of always-on payment rails gets offset by the economic inclusion argument, because that tradeoff never shows up in the sustainability reports.

No posts

Ready for more?